Publications on International and European Co-operation
Among other publications, this section includes replies to questions from Members of the European Parliament (MEPs). For a complete list of MEP questions, please consult the relevant section of the European Parliament’s website.
- 5 February 2021
- MEP LETTER
- 5 February 2021
- MEP LETTER
- 5 February 2021
- MEP LETTER
- 5 February 2021
- MEP LETTER
- 5 February 2021
- MEP LETTER
- 5 February 2021
- MEP LETTER
- 4 February 2021
- ECONOMIC BULLETIN BOXEconomic Bulletin Issue 1, 2021Details
- Abstract
- This box studies the relative impact on inflation of pandemic-induced demand and supply constraints for key advanced economies outside the euro area by using granular data on consumption expenditures and prices and a structural Bayesian Vector Autoregression (BVAR) framework. It finds that during the initial phase of the pandemic, consumer price inflation was driven more by demand-sensitive components and less by supply-sensitive ones. The structural analysis confirms a dominant role for demand shocks in the pandemic. It concludes that the impact of pandemic-related supply constraints on inflation appears limited to date. Yet, more granular analysis is needed to assess the consequences of the pandemic for the drivers of inflation.
- JEL Code
- C11 : Mathematical and Quantitative Methods→Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General→Bayesian Analysis: General
E31 : Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics→Prices, Business Fluctuations, and Cycles→Price Level, Inflation, Deflation
E32 : Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics→Prices, Business Fluctuations, and Cycles→Business Fluctuations, Cycles
O11 : Economic Development, Technological Change, and Growth→Economic Development→Macroeconomic Analyses of Economic Development
O40 : Economic Development, Technological Change, and Growth→Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity→General
- 2 February 2021
- ECONOMIC BULLETIN BOXEconomic Bulletin Issue 1, 2021Details
- Abstract
- This box examines the drivers of intra-country regional differences in the economic impact of the coronavirus (COVID-19), as observed in the four largest euro area economies during the initial phase of the pandemic. More specifically, it discusses how the interaction between government containment measures, sectoral structure and trade linkages helps explain the intra-country regional variations in the labour market impact of the pandemic. It finds that the different economic impact across regions cannot be explained solely by the spread of infections, a region’s economic structure is also a key determinant. Moreover, the trade relations of a region, both within and across countries, are found to be an important indirect channel through which coronavirus-related disturbances affect regional economic activity, highlighting vulnerabilities which may arise from disruptions to highly integrated EU supply chains.
- JEL Code
- R11 : Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics→General Regional Economics→Regional Economic Activity: Growth, Development, Environmental Issues, and Changes
F14 : International Economics→Trade→Empirical Studies of Trade
J40 : Labor and Demographic Economics→Particular Labor Markets→General
R15 : Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics→General Regional Economics→Econometric and Input?Output Models, Other Models
- 1 February 2021
- ECONOMIC BULLETIN BOXRotation towards normality – the impact of COVID-19 vaccine-related news on global financial marketsEconomic Bulletin Issue 1, 2021Details
- Abstract
- Using a database on vaccine probability events dating back to April 2020, this box assesses the impact of a broad range of COVID-19 vaccine-related news on global financial markets. It finds that positive vaccine news leads to a rotation back towards assets hardest hit by the pandemic, disproportionately benefits lagging economies and has a positive net effect on financial conditions.
- JEL Code
- F30 : International Economics→International Finance→General
G15 : Financial Economics→General Financial Markets→International Financial Markets
- 22 January 2021
- MEP LETTER
- 22 January 2021
- MEP LETTER
- 22 January 2021
- MEP LETTER
- 22 January 2021
- MEP LETTER
- 22 January 2021
- MEP LETTER
- 22 January 2021
- MEP LETTER
- 7 January 2021
- ECONOMIC BULLETIN BOXEconomic Bulletin Issue 8, 2020Details
- Abstract
- This box aims to assess the long-term implications of past crises for the global economy’s potential output and to discuss potential scarring effects of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. Starting with a review of past crises and the transmission channels through which potential output is affected, it concludes that the pandemic could leave scarring effects on the global economy, with labour supply likely to be initially hit the most. However, effects on the capital stock are potentially more relevant over the medium to long term.
- JEL Code
- C23 : Mathematical and Quantitative Methods→Single Equation Models, Single Variables→Panel Data Models, Spatio-temporal Models
E22 : Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics→Consumption, Saving, Production, Investment, Labor Markets, and Informal Economy→Capital, Investment, Capacity
E23 : Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics→Consumption, Saving, Production, Investment, Labor Markets, and Informal Economy→Production
E24 : Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics→Consumption, Saving, Production, Investment, Labor Markets, and Informal Economy→Employment, Unemployment, Wages, Intergenerational Income Distribution, Aggregate Human Capital
E32 : Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics→Prices, Business Fluctuations, and Cycles→Business Fluctuations, Cycles
O11 : Economic Development, Technological Change, and Growth→Economic Development→Macroeconomic Analyses of Economic Development
O40 : Economic Development, Technological Change, and Growth→Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity→General
- 4 January 2021
- ECONOMIC BULLETIN BOXEconomic Bulletin Issue 8, 2020Details
- Abstract
- This box assesses the implications of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic for the euro area tourism sector, trade in travel services and consumption of non-residents. Declining mobility during the pandemic has led to a slump in trade in services and tourism. As a result, the drop in non-resident consumption has acted as a shock amplification mechanism in countries exporting tourism services, i.e. countries which receive a lot of tourists, and as a shock absorption mechanism in countries importing tourism services. The partial recovery of tourism services observed during the summer months was mostly generated by domestic tourism substituting foreign tourism. The reintroduction of travel restrictions in October will likely imply that this substitution will continue to affect the dynamics of tourism services. High-frequency data on tourism, travel and services production point to a renewed overall deterioration of tourism services in the final quarter of 2020.
- JEL Code
- E01 : Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics→General→Measurement and Data on National Income and Product Accounts and Wealth, Environmental Accounts
E21 : Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics→Consumption, Saving, Production, Investment, Labor Markets, and Informal Economy→Consumption, Saving, Wealth
F14 : International Economics→Trade→Empirical Studies of Trade
Z3 : Other Special Topics
- 29 December 2020
- MEP LETTER
- 29 December 2020
- MEP LETTER
- 29 December 2020
- MEP LETTER
- 29 December 2020
- MEP LETTER
- 29 December 2020
- MEP LETTER
- 29 December 2020
- MEP LETTER
- 29 December 2020
- MEP LETTER
- 19 November 2020
- MEP LETTER
- 12 November 2020
- ECONOMIC BULLETIN BOXEconomic Bulletin Issue 7, 2020Details
- Abstract
- The September 2020 ECB staff macroeconomic projections used a revised weighting scheme for the euro area’s trading partners. Two key conceptual changes were implemented in the weighting scheme this year. First, data on trade in services were used in addition to data on trade in goods. Second, the number of euro area trading partners was increased from 30 to 42. As a result of these changes, the coverage of the euro area’s foreign demand by individual country data increased from 85% to 92%, with the remaining countries covered by regional aggregates.
- JEL Code
- E50 : Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics→Monetary Policy, Central Banking, and the Supply of Money and Credit→General
E66 : Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics→Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook→General Outlook and Conditions
F01 : International Economics→General→Global Outlook
F17 : International Economics→Trade→Trade Forecasting and Simulation
- 30 October 2020
- MEP LETTER
- 30 October 2020
- MEP LETTER
- 30 October 2020
- MEP LETTER
- 28 September 2020
- MEP LETTER
- 25 September 2020
- MEP LETTER
- 25 September 2020
- MEP LETTER
- 25 September 2020
- MEP LETTER
- 23 September 2020
- ECONOMIC BULLETIN ARTICLEEconomic Bulletin Issue 6, 2020Details
- Abstract
- Adverse shocks induced by containment measures in response to the coronavirus (COVID-19) are not limited to the originating country. Foreign trade, while not the sole propagation mechanism, transmits these shocks across economies. In the euro area, the deep integration of firms within regional supply chains ‑ as well as strong final demand linkages ‑ acts as a magnifying mechanism. This article quantifies the propagation and impact of adverse shocks originating in the euro area on euro area GDP, foreign trade and trade balances. It concludes that the transmission to the rest of the euro area of a shock originating in one of the five largest Member States ranges from 15% to 28% of the original shock’s size. The negative spillover effects are most severe for open countries and those most intertwined in regional production network.
- JEL Code
- F00 : International Economics→General→General
F15 : International Economics→Trade→Economic Integration
F62 : International Economics→Economic Impacts of Globalization→Macroeconomic Impacts
- 23 September 2020
- ECONOMIC BULLETIN BOXEconomic Bulletin Issue 6, 2020Details
- Abstract
- The EU’s recovery package represents an important milestone in European economic policy integration. The European financial support to be provided is intended to have a meaningful volume in macroeconomic terms, totalling almost 5% of euro area GDP. Moreover, the allocation key ensures stronger macroeconomic support for more vulnerable countries. This coordinated European policy response to COVID-19 is essential to avoid an uneven recovery and economic fragmentation while promoting economic resilience in Member States. Finally, the way that the EU has responded to the crisis also has implications for the implementation and future design of the European governance framework.
- JEL Code
- F45 : International Economics→Macroeconomic Aspects of International Trade and Finance
E62 : Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics→Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook→Fiscal Policy
H12 : Public Economics→Structure and Scope of Government→Crisis Management
- 21 September 2020
- ECONOMIC BULLETIN ARTICLEEconomic Bulletin Issue 6, 2020Details
- Abstract
- This article will trace the decline and subsequent recovery of China’s economy following the outbreak of the coronavirus (COVID-19). It employs high-frequency data to assess the speed at which activity in different sectors of the economy is normalising after businesses were allowed to resume operations. One particular focus will be on differentiating between the industrial and services sectors, which are subject to different health and safety measures. The article finds that China’s economic activity rose from a trough of around 20% of normal levels in February 2020 to 90% in the span of just three months. While production capacity recovered swiftly, activity normalised more gradually in the services sector, where COVID-19 containment measures had continued to weigh heavily. The recovery was driven primarily by private domestic demand and the authorities’ policy response, as the normalisation in China coincided with the implementation of lockdown measures by many of its trading partners and hence also with a fall in external demand. Looking ahead, uncertainty and risks surrounding the recovery path remain exceptionally high, owing in large part to the uncertainty regarding how the COVID-19 pandemic will develop and if and when a medical solution to the virus can be found.
- JEL Code
- E2 : Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics→Consumption, Saving, Production, Investment, Labor Markets, and Informal Economy
E5 : Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics→Monetary Policy, Central Banking, and the Supply of Money and Credit
E6 : Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics→Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook
F1 : International Economics→Trade
G1 : Financial Economics→General Financial Markets
- 2 September 2020
- MEP LETTER
- 2 September 2020
- MEP LETTER
- 2 September 2020
- MEP LETTER
- 2 September 2020
- MEP LETTER
- 2 September 2020
- MEP LETTER
- 24 July 2020
- MEP LETTER
- 10 July 2020
- OTHER PUBLICATIONS
- 10 July 2020
- OTHER PUBLICATIONS
- 29 June 2020
- MEP LETTER
- 29 June 2020
- MEP LETTER
- 29 June 2020
- MEP LETTER
- 19 June 2020
- MEP LETTER
- 19 June 2020
- MEP LETTER
- 19 June 2020
- MEP LETTER
- 19 June 2020
- MEP LETTER
- 9 June 2020
- THE INTERNATIONAL ROLE OF THE EUROAnnexes
- 9 June 2020
- ANNEX
Related- 9 June 2020
- PRESS RELEASES
- 8 June 2020
- OTHER PUBLICATIONS
- 5 June 2020
- MEP LETTER
- 15 May 2020
- MEP LETTER
- 15 May 2020
- MEP LETTER
- 15 May 2020
- MEP LETTER
- 15 May 2020
- MEP LETTER
- 15 May 2020
- MEP LETTER
- 15 May 2020
- MEP LETTER
- 11 May 2020
- MEP LETTER
- 11 May 2020
- MEP LETTER
- 11 May 2020
- MEP LETTER
- 7 May 2020
- OTHER PUBLICATIONSEnglishOTHER LANGUAGES (21) +Related
- 7 May 2020
- ANNUAL REPORTEnglishOTHER LANGUAGES (21) +
- 22 April 2020
- MEP LETTER
- 22 April 2020
- MEP LETTER
- 22 April 2020
- MEP LETTER
- 22 April 2020
- MEP LETTER
- 22 April 2020
- MEP LETTER
- 26 March 2020
- ECONOMIC BULLETIN BOXEconomic Bulletin Issue 2, 2020Details
- Abstract
- This box assesses the impact of fiscal measures to address climate change on growth and inflation over the March 2020 ECB staff projection horizon. Policies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in the EU comprise: (a) the EU Emissions Trading System (ETS) and (b) national measures in sectors which are not covered by the ETS. Overall, the baseline assumes some impact of climate measures on prices related to the German climate package, while the assumed impact of measures in other countries is limited.
- JEL Code
- E3 : Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics→Prices, Business Fluctuations, and Cycles
Q58 : Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics, Environmental and Ecological Economics→Environmental Economics→Government Policy
E62 : Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics→Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook→Fiscal Policy
- 25 March 2020
- ECONOMIC BULLETIN BOXEconomic Bulletin Issue 2, 2020Details
- Abstract
- The US corporate tax reform that entered into force at the beginning of 2018 resulted in foreign direct investment flows reversing for the first time in the euro area. The episode is explained fully by developments in countries which are financial centres, where disinvestment operations were carried out via special purpose entities, initially through transactions in equities and later also in debt securities. Besides the bilateral flows with the United States, which were the first to be affected, foreign direct investment flows to and from offshore centres also reversed, reflecting the complex geographical structure of capital allocation by US multinational enterprises.
- JEL Code
- F32 : International Economics→International Finance→Current Account Adjustment, Short-Term Capital Movements
F38 : International Economics→International Finance→International Financial Policy: Financial Transactions Tax; Capital Controls
- 24 March 2020
- ECONOMIC BULLETIN ARTICLEEconomic Bulletin Issue 2, 2020Details
- Abstract
- This article analyses how the operations of large multinational enterprises (MNEs) affect the external account of the euro area and, in general, financial centres. The increased ease of moving intangible assets, profits and headquarters across borders poses challenges to the current framework of international statistics and economic analysis. First, the article shows how MNE operations are recorded in cross-border statistics, as well as the challenges in measuring such data. Second, the article highlights evidence of the impact that MNEs have on the external account of the euro area – this is most evident in current account balances and foreign direct investment in euro area financial centres, often involving special-purpose entities (SPEs). Third, the article looks at the tendency of financial centres to report current account surpluses that may be tentatively attributed, in part, to the activity of MNEs. Multilateral initiatives could help to improve the transparency of MNE operations and ensure an exchange of information across borders for tax and statistical purposes.
- JEL Code
- F21 : International Economics→International Factor Movements and International Business→International Investment, Long-Term Capital Movements
F23 : International Economics→International Factor Movements and International Business→Multinational Firms, International Business
F3 : International Economics→International Finance
- 23 March 2020
- ECONOMIC BULLETIN BOXEconomic Bulletin Issue 2, 2020Details
- Abstract
- This box presents a simple indicator for US real economic activity based on the textual analysis of newspaper articles. The indicator correlates well with US contractions and NBER recession dates. In order to formally assess the predictive information content of the index, it is included in a regression framework in which US recessions are forecast. Results suggest that the index has good forecasting properties, outperforming a standard yield curve model at short horizons (up to eight months ahead). The text analysis index also improves the forecasting performance of standard yield curve models at longer horizons. Taken together, these results suggest that the index is useful for monitoring and predicting economic developments, particularly over short horizons. This approach also has the advantage of being easily updatable (on a daily basis) and applicable to different countries.
- JEL Code
- C1 : Mathematical and Quantitative Methods→Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General
C25 : Mathematical and Quantitative Methods→Single Equation Models, Single Variables→Discrete Regression and Qualitative Choice Models, Discrete Regressors, Proportions
E32 : Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics→Prices, Business Fluctuations, and Cycles→Business Fluctuations, Cycles
E37 : Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics→Prices, Business Fluctuations, and Cycles→Forecasting and Simulation: Models and Applications
- 23 March 2020
- ECONOMIC BULLETIN ARTICLEEconomic Bulletin Issue 2, 2020Details
- Abstract
- This article provides a comprehensive overview of progress with the deepening of Europe’s Economic and Monetary Union (EMU). The start of a new legislative period for the European Union (2019-24) is a natural and opportune moment to take stock of progress towards completion of the architecture of EMU. The agenda that was proposed in the 2015 Five Presidents’ Report has yet to be fully implemented, with outstanding measures in the financial, fiscal, economic and political domains. This article surveys those various domains, looking at the elements that have been completed, those that are still ongoing, and those that are desirable but not yet under way. It then identifies priorities in terms of completing the banking union, deepening the integration of Europe’s capital markets, improving the euro area’s fiscal architecture and increasing the resilience of national economic structures.
- JEL Code
- E61 : Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics→Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook→Policy Objectives, Policy Designs and Consistency, Policy Coordination
E63 : Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics→Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook→Comparative or Joint Analysis of Fiscal and Monetary Policy, Stabilization, Treasury Policy
F55 : International Economics→International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy→International Institutional Arrangements
G28 : Financial Economics→Financial Institutions and Services→Government Policy and Regulation
- 6 February 2020
- ECONOMIC BULLETIN BOXEconomic Bulletin Issue 1, 2020Details
- Abstract
- The inversion of the US yield curve during the summer of 2019 increased speculation about the possibility of a US recession. However, standard yield curve-based recession probability models ignore factors such as the impact of quantitative easing measures that can distort the signals derived from the current yield curve. This box presents alternative models to deal with these possible distortions. In particular, measures of the term spread that account for asset purchases in the United States, spillovers from euro area purchases to US yields and the effect of foreign official reserve holdings on long-term US yields are constructed. US recession probability models that account for asset purchases predict significantly lower recession probabilities than those implied by standard yield curve models, pointing to a somewhat more benign outlook for the US economy.
- JEL Code
- E32 : Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics→Prices, Business Fluctuations, and Cycles→Business Fluctuations, Cycles
E44 : Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics→Money and Interest Rates→Financial Markets and the Macroeconomy
E47 : Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics→Money and Interest Rates→Forecasting and Simulation: Models and Applications
G17 : Financial Economics→General Financial Markets→Financial Forecasting and Simulation
- 6 February 2020
- ECONOMIC BULLETIN BOXEconomic Bulletin Issue 1, 2020Details
- Abstract
- Over the past year the global economy has transitioned from a robust and synchronised expansion to a widespread slowdown. Global growth has weakened on the back of soft investment, which was also a key driver of global trade’s sharp fall into contractionary territory in the first half of 2019 (see Chart A). The slowdown in global investment and trade has occurred in an environment of rising trade tensions between the United States and China, slowing Chinese demand, (geo-)political tensions, Brexit and idiosyncratic stresses in several emerging economies, with rising uncertainty magnifying the negative impact. Against this backdrop, this box assesses the role of uncertainty in the recent slowdown of global investment and trade.
- JEL Code
- F21 : International Economics→International Factor Movements and International Business→International Investment, Long-Term Capital Movements
F44 : International Economics→Macroeconomic Aspects of International Trade and Finance→International Business Cycles
C54 : Mathematical and Quantitative Methods→Econometric Modeling→Quantitative Policy Modeling
- 24 January 2020
- MEP LETTER
- 24 January 2020
- MEP LETTER
- 24 January 2020
- MEP LETTER
- 20 December 2019
- MEP LETTER
- 20 December 2019
- MEP LETTER
- 13 December 2019
- MEP LETTER
- 13 December 2019
- MEP LETTER
- 13 December 2019
- MEP LETTER
- 22 November 2019
- MEP LETTER
- 27 September 2019
- MEP LETTER
- 27 September 2019
- MEP LETTER
- 27 September 2019
- MEP LETTER
- 27 September 2019
- MEP LETTER
- 8 August 2019
- ECONOMIC BULLETIN BOXEconomic Bulletin Issue 5, 2019Details
- Abstract
- This box examines the fiscal policy recommendations addressed to the euro area countries against the background of downside risks to the outlook for a continued economic expansion. The examination shows that in countries with high levels of government debt, building buffers to strengthen resilience in cyclical downturns remains a priority for fiscal policies. At the same time, countries that have achieved sound fiscal positions could utilise some fiscal space for measures to support economic growth.
- JEL Code
- E62 : Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics→Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook→Fiscal Policy
H6 : Public Economics→National Budget, Deficit, and Debt
- 8 August 2019
- ECONOMIC BULLETIN BOXEconomic Bulletin Issue 5, 2019Details
- Abstract
- This box examines the country-specific recommendations (CSRs) for economic policies in euro area countries under the 2019 European Semester. Overall, the 2019 CSRs place greater emphasis on investment-enhancing structural policies and financial sector policies. However, continued weak CSR implementation by Member States remains a challenge. The implementation of structural reforms needs to be substantially stepped up to increase the economic resilience and growth potential of the euro area.
- JEL Code
- E02 : Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics→General→Institutions and the Macroeconomy
E6 : Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics→Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook
F02 : International Economics→General→International Economic Order
- 26 July 2019
- MEP LETTER
- 26 July 2019
- MEP LETTER
- 10 July 2019
- MEP LETTER
- 28 June 2019
- MEP LETTER
- 14 June 2019
- MEP LETTER
- 14 June 2019
- MEP LETTER
- 14 June 2019
- MEP LETTER
- 14 June 2019
- MEP LETTER
- 13 June 2019
- THE INTERNATIONAL ROLE OF THE EUROAnnexes
- 12 June 2019
- THE INTERNATIONAL ROLE OF THE EURO
Related- 13 June 2019
- PRESS RELEASES
- 2 May 2019
- MEP LETTER
- 2 May 2019
- MEP LETTER
- 2 May 2019
- MEP LETTER
- 2 May 2019
- MEP LETTER
- 2 May 2019
- MEP LETTER
- 1 April 2019
- OTHER PUBLICATIONSRelated
- 1 April 2019
- OTHER PUBLICATIONSEnglishOTHER LANGUAGES (21) +Related
- 1 April 2019
- OTHER PUBLICATIONS
- 1 April 2019
- ANNUAL REPORTEnglishOTHER LANGUAGES (21) +
- 28 March 2019
- MEP LETTER
- 28 March 2019
- MEP LETTER
- 28 March 2019
- MEP LETTER
- 28 March 2019
- MEP LETTER
- 28 March 2019
- MEP LETTER
- 28 March 2019
- MEP LETTER
- 22 February 2019
- MEP LETTER
- 13 February 2019
- MEP LETTER
- 13 February 2019
- MEP LETTER
- 16 January 2019
- MEP LETTER
- 16 January 2019
- MEP LETTER
- 28 November 2018
- MEP LETTER
- 16 November 2018
- MEP LETTER
- 16 November 2018
- MEP LETTER
- 16 November 2018
- MEP LETTER
- 16 November 2018
- MEP LETTER
- 16 November 2018
- MEP LETTER
- 16 November 2018
- MEP LETTER
- 16 November 2018
- MEP LETTER
- 14 September 2018
- MEP LETTER
- 14 September 2018
- MEP LETTER
- 14 September 2018
- MEP LETTER
- 14 September 2018
- MEP LETTER
- 14 September 2018
- MEP LETTER
- 26 July 2018
- MEP LETTER
- 26 July 2018
- MEP LETTER
- 26 June 2018
- ECONOMIC BULLETIN ARTICLEEconomic Bulletin Issue 4, 2018Details
- Abstract
- The relevance of foreign direct investment (FDI) as a source of economic activity has increased rapidly over the last decade. Between 2000 and 2016 the share of FDI stock in global GDP increased from 22% to 35%. Following a decline during the Great Recession, mergers and acquisitions (M&As), the most dynamic component of FDI, have recovered, reaching a record value of USD 1.2 trillion in the first quarter of 2018. The intensification of FDI activity has important implications for both origin and destination countries in terms of, for example, economic growth, productivity, wages and employment. Moreover, the expansion of multinational enterprises (MNEs) has been accompanied by the creation of complex cross-border production chains, which also has important implications. This article presents several findings regarding the main developments in and determinants of FDI over the past decade, at both global and EU level. Since the beginning of the 2000s there has been a gradual shift in the global FDI landscape, with emerging market economies (EMEs) gaining in prominence both as a source of and as a destination for such investment. EMEs have attracted a growing share of FDI flows, reaching more than 50% of the world’s total inward FDI in 2013. In addition, FDI flows are dominated by a relatively small number of M&As. In 2016 M&As with a value in excess of USD 1 billion accounted for only 1% of all FDI projects, but they generated 55% of total FDI flows. Moreover, evidence suggests that FDI and exports are not competing but complementary strategies for serving foreign markets. Finally, since 2008 EU countries are no longer the world’s main FDI investors and recipients. Nevertheless, econometric analysis shows that belonging to the EU dramatically boosts FDI flows in member countries.
- JEL Code
- F21 : International Economics→International Factor Movements and International Business→International Investment, Long-Term Capital Movements
F23 : International Economics→International Factor Movements and International Business→Multinational Firms, International Business
- 15 June 2018
- MEP LETTER
- 15 June 2018
- MEP LETTER
- 15 June 2018
- MEP LETTER
- 15 June 2018
- MEP LETTER
- 5 June 2018
- THE INTERNATIONAL ROLE OF THE EURO
- 26 April 2018
- MEP LETTER
- 26 April 2018
- MEP LETTER
- 26 April 2018
- MEP LETTER
- 26 April 2018
- MEP LETTER
- 26 April 2018
- MEP LETTER
- 26 April 2018
- MEP LETTER
- 26 April 2018
- MEP LETTER
- 26 April 2018
- MEP LETTER
- 26 April 2018
- MEP LETTER
- 9 April 2018
- OTHER PUBLICATIONSEnglishOTHER LANGUAGES (21) +
- 14 March 2018
- MEP LETTER
- 8 February 2018
- OTHER PUBLICATIONS
- 8 February 2018
- OTHER PUBLICATIONS
- 8 February 2018
- OTHER PUBLICATIONS
- 8 February 2018
- OTHER PUBLICATIONS
- 26 January 2018
- MEP LETTER
- 24 January 2018
- MEP LETTER
- 24 January 2018
- MEP LETTER
- 24 January 2018
- MEP LETTER
- 15 December 2017
- MEP LETTER
- 29 November 2017
- MEP LETTER
- 29 November 2017
- MEP LETTER
- 9 November 2017
- MEP LETTER
- 9 November 2017
- MEP LETTER
- 9 November 2017
- MEP LETTER
- 9 November 2017
- MEP LETTER
- 9 November 2017
- MEP LETTER
- 13 October 2017
- MEP LETTER
- 13 October 2017
- MEP LETTER
- 10 October 2017
- MEP LETTER
- 10 October 2017
- MEP LETTER
- 15 September 2017
- MEP LETTER
- 15 September 2017
- MEP LETTER
- 30 August 2017
- MEP LETTER
- 30 August 2017
- MEP LETTER
- 30 August 2017
- MEP LETTER
- 25 July 2017
- MEP LETTER
- 20 July 2017
- MEP LETTER
- 20 July 2017
- MEP LETTER
- 20 July 2017
- MEP LETTER
- 7 July 2017
- OTHER PUBLICATIONS
- 6 July 2017
- MEP LETTER
- 5 July 2017
- THE INTERNATIONAL ROLE OF THE EURO
- 26 June 2017
- MEP LETTER
- 26 June 2017
- MEP LETTER
- 26 June 2017
- MEP LETTER
- 16 June 2017
- MEP LETTER
- 8 June 2017
- MEP LETTER
- 8 June 2017
- MEP LETTER
- 8 June 2017
- MEP LETTER
- 23 May 2017
- MEP LETTER
- 23 May 2017
- MEP LETTER
- 11 May 2017
- MEP LETTER
- 11 May 2017
- MEP LETTER
- 11 May 2017
- MEP LETTER
- 11 May 2017
- MEP LETTER
- 11 May 2017
- MEP LETTER
- 2 May 2017
- OTHER PUBLICATIONS
- 11 April 2017
- MEP LETTER
- 11 April 2017
- MEP LETTER
- 11 April 2017
- MEP LETTER
- 10 April 2017
- OTHER PUBLICATIONS
- 10 April 2017
- OTHER PUBLICATIONSEnglishOTHER LANGUAGES (22) +
- 6 April 2017
- MEP LETTER
- 6 April 2017
- MEP LETTER
- 6 April 2017
- MEP LETTER
- 1 March 2017
- MEP LETTER
- 1 March 2017
- MEP LETTER
- 6 February 2017
- MEP LETTER
- 3 February 2017
- MEP LETTER
- 3 February 2017
- MEP LETTER
- 3 February 2017
- MEP LETTER
- 23 January 2017
- MEP LETTER
- 20 January 2017
- MEP LETTER
- 20 January 2017
- MEP LETTER
- 20 January 2017
- MEP LETTER
- 20 January 2017
- MEP LETTER
- 20 January 2017
- MEP LETTER
- 20 January 2017
- MEP LETTER
- 11 January 2017
- MEP LETTER
- 11 January 2017
- MEP LETTER
- 22 December 2016
- MEP LETTER
- 15 December 2016
- MEP LETTER
- 29 November 2016
- MEP LETTER
- 29 November 2016
- MEP LETTER
- 17 November 2016
- MEP LETTER
- 17 November 2016
- MEP LETTER
- 17 November 2016
- MEP LETTER
- 9 November 2016
- MEP LETTER
- 21 October 2016
- MEP LETTER
- 18 October 2016
- MEP LETTER
- 18 October 2016
- MEP LETTER
- 18 October 2016
- MEP LETTER
- 20 September 2016
- MEP LETTER
- 20 September 2016
- MEP LETTER
- 14 September 2016
- OTHER PUBLICATIONS
- 31 August 2016
- MEP LETTER
- 31 August 2016
- MEP LETTER
- 31 August 2016
- MEP LETTER
- 31 August 2016
- MEP LETTER
- 4 August 2016
- ECONOMIC BULLETIN ARTICLEEconomic Bulletin Issue 5, 2016
- 27 July 2016
- MEP LETTER
- 7 July 2016
- MEP LETTER
- 7 July 2016
- MEP LETTER
- 7 July 2016
- MEP LETTER
- 7 July 2016
- MEP LETTER
- 15 June 2016
- MEP LETTER
- 8 June 2016
- MEP LETTER
- 8 June 2016
- MEP LETTER
- 8 June 2016
- THE INTERNATIONAL ROLE OF THE EURO
- 2 June 2016
- MEP LETTER
- 2 June 2016
- MEP LETTER
- 2 June 2016
- MEP LETTER
- 2 June 2016
- MEP LETTER
- 2 June 2016
- MEP LETTER
- 2 June 2016
- MEP LETTER
- 2 June 2016
- MEP LETTER
- 20 May 2016
- MEP LETTER
- 18 May 2016
- MEP LETTER
- 18 May 2016
- MEP LETTER
- 18 May 2016
- MEP LETTER
- 3 May 2016
- MEP LETTER
- 3 May 2016
- MEP LETTER
- 3 May 2016
- MEP LETTER
- 3 May 2016
- MEP LETTER
- 22 April 2016
- MEP LETTER
- 22 April 2016
- MEP LETTER
- 22 April 2016
- MEP LETTER
- 22 April 2016
- MEP LETTER
- 21 April 2016
- MEP LETTER
- 7 April 2016
- OTHER PUBLICATIONS
- 7 April 2016
- OTHER PUBLICATIONS
- 6 April 2016
- MEP LETTER
- 6 April 2016
- MEP LETTER
- 6 April 2016
- MEP LETTER
- 5 April 2016
- MEP LETTER
- 5 April 2016
- MEP LETTER
- 5 April 2016
- MEP LETTER
- 15 March 2016
- MEP LETTER
- 15 March 2016
- MEP LETTER
- 15 March 2016
- MEP LETTER
- 15 March 2016
- MEP LETTER
- 1 March 2016
- OTHER PUBLICATIONS
- 1 March 2016
- MEP LETTER
- 1 March 2016
- MEP LETTER
- 1 March 2016
- MEP LETTER
- 18 February 2016
- MEP LETTER
- 18 February 2016
- MEP LETTER
- 18 February 2016
- MEP LETTER
- 18 February 2016
- MEP LETTER
- 18 February 2016
- MEP LETTER
- 18 February 2016
- MEP LETTER
- 4 February 2016
- MEP LETTER
- 4 February 2016
- MEP LETTER
- 4 February 2016
- MEP LETTER
- 4 February 2016
- MEP LETTER
- 4 February 2016
- MEP LETTER
- 26 January 2016
- MEP LETTER
- 15 January 2016
- MEP LETTER
- 13 January 2016
- MEP LETTER
- 13 January 2016
- MEP LETTER
- 13 January 2016
- MEP LETTER
- 18 December 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 18 December 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 16 December 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 10 December 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 3 December 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 3 December 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 2 December 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 2 December 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 2 December 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 2 December 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 2 December 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 2 December 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 2 December 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 2 December 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 2 December 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 2 December 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 17 November 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 17 November 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 17 November 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 17 November 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 17 November 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 17 November 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 17 November 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 17 November 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 4 November 2015
- ECONOMIC BULLETIN BOXEconomic Bulletin Issue 7, 2015
- 28 October 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 28 October 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 22 October 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 22 October 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 29 September 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 22 September 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 18 September 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 18 September 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 18 September 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 18 September 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 18 September 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 18 September 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 18 September 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 8 September 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 8 September 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 3 September 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 3 September 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 3 September 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 3 September 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 3 September 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 3 September 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 3 September 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 3 September 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 29 July 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 29 July 2015
- OTHER PUBLICATIONS
- 14 July 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 14 July 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 14 July 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 14 July 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 14 July 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 8 July 2015
- THE INTERNATIONAL ROLE OF THE EURORelated
- 8 July 2015
- PRESS RELEASES
- 1 July 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 1 July 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 1 July 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 22 June 2015
- OTHER PUBLICATIONSEnglishOTHER LANGUAGES (22) +Related
- 22 June 2015
- PRESS RELEASES
- 18 June 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 18 June 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 18 June 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 18 June 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 18 June 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 18 June 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 11 June 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 11 June 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 11 June 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 11 June 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 22 May 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 22 May 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 22 May 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 22 May 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 22 May 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 22 May 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 22 May 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 8 May 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 8 May 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 8 May 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 8 May 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 8 May 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 8 May 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 8 May 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 8 May 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 8 May 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 21 April 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 21 April 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 21 April 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 21 April 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 21 April 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 21 April 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 21 April 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 21 April 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 21 April 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 21 April 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 21 April 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 21 April 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 21 April 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 21 April 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 21 April 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 15 April 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 15 April 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 15 April 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 15 April 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 15 April 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 15 April 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 15 April 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 15 April 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 15 April 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 1 April 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 1 April 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 1 April 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 11 March 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 11 March 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 11 March 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 11 March 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 11 March 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 11 March 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 3 March 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 3 March 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 3 March 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 3 March 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 24 February 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 24 February 2015
- OTHER PUBLICATIONS
- 18 February 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 18 February 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 18 February 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 18 February 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 18 February 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 26 January 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 14 January 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 14 January 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 14 January 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 8 January 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 8 January 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 8 January 2015
- MEP LETTER
- 19 December 2014
- MEP LETTER
- 19 December 2014
- OTHER PUBLICATIONS
- 17 December 2014
- MEP LETTER
- 17 December 2014
- MEP LETTER
- 17 December 2014
- MEP LETTER
- 10 December 2014
- MEP LETTER
- 26 November 2014
- MEP LETTER
- 26 November 2014
- MEP LETTER
- 26 November 2014
- MEP LETTER
- 3 November 2014
- MEP LETTER
- 3 November 2014
- MEP LETTER
- 3 November 2014
- MEP LETTER
- 3 November 2014
- MEP LETTER
- 3 November 2014
- MEP LETTER
- 3 November 2014
- MEP LETTER
- 3 November 2014
- MEP LETTER
- 3 November 2014
- MEP LETTER
- 3 November 2014
- MEP LETTER
- 17 October 2014
- MEP LETTER
- 17 October 2014
- OTHER PUBLICATIONS
- 10 October 2014
- OTHER PUBLICATIONS
- 1 October 2014
- MEP LETTER
- 1 October 2014
- MEP LETTER
- 1 October 2014
- MEP LETTER
- 24 September 2014
- MEP LETTER
- 7 August 2014
- MEP LETTER
- 16 July 2014
- THE INTERNATIONAL ROLE OF THE EURORelated
- 16 July 2014
- PRESS RELEASES
- 26 May 2014
- MEP LETTER
- 26 May 2014
- MEP LETTER
- 21 May 2014
- MEP LETTER
- 7 May 2014
- MEP LETTER
- 19 February 2014
- MEP LETTER
- 19 February 2014
- MEP LETTER
- 19 February 2014
- MEP LETTER
- 28 January 2014
- MEP LETTER
- 28 January 2014
- MEP LETTER
- 28 January 2014
- MEP LETTER
- 28 January 2014
- MEP LETTER
- 28 January 2014
- OTHER PUBLICATIONSRelated
- 28 January 2014
- PRESS RELEASES
- 16 January 2014
- ECONOMIC BULLETIN ARTICLEEconomic Bulletin Issue 1, 2014
- 13 January 2014
- MEP LETTER
- 13 January 2014
- MEP LETTER
- 13 January 2014
- MEP LETTER
- 10 January 2014
- OTHER PUBLICATIONS
- 19 December 2013
- MEP LETTER
- 19 December 2013
- MEP LETTER
- 19 December 2013
- MEP LETTER
- 25 November 2013
- MEP LETTER
- 25 November 2013
- MEP LETTER
- 20 November 2013
- MEP LETTER
- 23 October 2013
- MEP LETTER
- 30 September 2013
- MEP LETTER
- 10 September 2013
- MEP LETTER
- 10 September 2013
- MEP LETTER
- 10 September 2013
- MEP LETTER
- 1 August 2013
- MEP LETTER
- 1 August 2013
- MEP LETTER
- 1 August 2013
- MEP LETTER
- 1 August 2013
- MEP LETTER
- 1 August 2013
- MEP LETTER
- 1 August 2013
- MEP LETTER
- 19 July 2013
- MEP LETTER
- 16 July 2013
- MEP LETTER
- 16 July 2013
- MEP LETTER
- 16 July 2013
- MEP LETTER
- 16 July 2013
- MEP LETTER
- 11 July 2013
- MEP LETTER
- 11 July 2013
- MEP LETTER
- 11 July 2013
- MEP LETTER
- 11 July 2013
- MEP LETTER
- 11 July 2013
- MEP LETTER
- 11 July 2013
- MEP LETTER
- 11 July 2013
- MEP LETTER
- 2 July 2013
- THE INTERNATIONAL ROLE OF THE EURORelated
- 2 July 2013
- PRESS RELEASES
- 25 June 2013
- MEP LETTER
- 25 June 2013
- MEP LETTER
- 25 June 2013
- MEP LETTER
- 20 June 2013
- MEP LETTER
- 13 May 2013
- MEP LETTER
- 13 May 2013
- MEP LETTER
- 13 May 2013
- MEP LETTER
- 13 May 2013
- MEP LETTER
- 13 May 2013
- MEP LETTER
- 13 May 2013
- MEP LETTER
- 4 April 2013
- MEP LETTER
- 4 April 2013
- MEP LETTER
- 15 March 2013
- MEP LETTER
- 28 January 2013
- OTHER PUBLICATIONS
- 17 January 2013
- ECONOMIC BULLETIN ARTICLEEconomic Bulletin Issue 1, 2013
- 9 January 2013
- MEP LETTER
- 9 January 2013
- MEP LETTER
- 4 December 2012
- MEP LETTER
- 4 December 2012
- MEP LETTER
- 23 November 2012
- MEP LETTER
- 15 November 2012
- ECONOMIC BULLETIN ARTICLEEconomic Bulletin Issue 11, 2012
- 15 November 2012
- MEP LETTER
- 15 November 2012
- MEP LETTER
- 7 November 2012
- MEP LETTER
- 7 November 2012
- MEP LETTER
- 7 November 2012
- MEP LETTER
- 7 November 2012
- MEP LETTER
- 7 November 2012
- MEP LETTER
- 2 August 2012
- MEP LETTER
- 2 August 2012
- MEP LETTER
- 11 July 2012
- THE INTERNATIONAL ROLE OF THE EURORelated
- 11 July 2012
- PRESS RELEASES
- 4 July 2012
- OTHER PUBLICATIONS
- 4 July 2012
- MEP LETTER
- 14 June 2012
- MEP LETTER
- 14 June 2012
- MEP LETTER
- 11 June 2012
- MEP LETTER
- 24 May 2012
- MEP LETTER
- 24 April 2012
- MEP LETTER
- 24 April 2012
- MEP LETTER
- 24 April 2012
- MEP LETTER
- 2 April 2012
- MEP LETTER
- 15 March 2012
- MEP LETTER
- 5 March 2012
- MEP LETTER
- 5 March 2012
- MEP LETTER
- 23 February 2012
- MEP LETTER
- 23 February 2012
- MEP LETTER
- 23 February 2012
- MEP LETTER
- 23 February 2012
- MEP LETTER
- 27 January 2012
- MEP LETTER
- 18 January 2012
- MEP LETTER
- 2 January 2012
- MEP LETTER
- 2 January 2012
- MEP LETTER
- 20 December 2011
- MEP LETTER
- 20 December 2011
- MEP LETTER
- 9 December 2011
- MEP LETTER
- 20 October 2011
- MEP LETTER
- 19 October 2011
- MEP LETTER
- 5 August 2011
- MEP LETTER
- 3 August 2011
- MEP LETTER
- 22 July 2011
- THE INTERNATIONAL ROLE OF THE EURORelated
- 22 July 2011
- PRESS RELEASES
- 5 July 2011
- MEP LETTER
- 21 June 2011
- MEP LETTER
- 16 June 2011
- OTHER PUBLICATIONS
- 10 June 2011
- MEP LETTER
- 10 June 2011
- MEP LETTER
- 12 May 2011
- ECONOMIC BULLETIN ARTICLEEconomic Bulletin Issue 5, 2011
- 3 May 2011
- MEP LETTER
- 19 April 2011
- MEP LETTER
- 19 April 2011
- MEP LETTER
- 4 March 2011
- MEP LETTER
- 17 February 2011
- MEP LETTER
- 14 February 2011
- OTHER PUBLICATIONS
- 10 February 2011
- MEP LETTER
- 21 January 2011
- MEP LETTER
- 19 January 2011
- MEP LETTER
- 19 January 2011
- MEP LETTER
- 17 January 2011
- MEP LETTER
- 14 January 2011
- MEP LETTER
- 8 December 2010
- MEP LETTER
- 2 December 2010
- MEP LETTER
- 15 July 2010
- ECONOMIC BULLETIN ARTICLEEconomic Bulletin Issue 7, 2010
- 14 July 2010
- THE INTERNATIONAL ROLE OF THE EURORelated
- 14 July 2010
- PRESS RELEASES
- 7 July 2010
- MEP LETTER
- 28 June 2010
- MEP LETTER
- 17 June 2010
- MEP LETTER
- 17 June 2010
- OTHER PUBLICATIONS
- 21 May 2010
- MEP LETTER
- 24 March 2010
- MEP LETTER
- 16 March 2010
- MEP LETTER
- 12 March 2010
- OTHER PUBLICATIONSRelated
- 19 January 2010
- PRESS RELEASES
- 11 March 2010
- MEP LETTER
- 18 February 2010
- MEP LETTER
- 2 February 2010
- MEP LETTER
- 21 January 2010
- ECONOMIC BULLETIN ARTICLEEconomic Bulletin Issue 1, 2010
- 14 January 2010
- OTHER PUBLICATIONS
- 22 October 2009
- MEP LETTER
- 16 October 2009
- MEP LETTER
- 8 July 2009
- THE INTERNATIONAL ROLE OF THE EURORelated
- 8 July 2009
- PRESS RELEASES
- 15 May 2009
- MEP LETTER
- 14 May 2009
- ECONOMIC BULLETIN ARTICLEEconomic Bulletin Issue 5, 2009
- 26 March 2009
- MEP LETTER
- 16 March 2009
- MEP LETTER
- 12 March 2009
- MEP LETTER
- 12 March 2009
- MEP LETTER
- 12 February 2009
- ECONOMIC BULLETIN ARTICLEEconomic Bulletin Issue 2, 2009
- 28 January 2009
- MEP LETTER
- 22 January 2009
- ECONOMIC BULLETIN ARTICLEEconomic Bulletin Issue 1, 2009
- 28 October 2008
- MEP LETTER
- 28 October 2008
- MEP LETTER
- 15 July 2008
- MEP LETTER
- 15 July 2008
- MEP LETTER
- 10 July 2008
- ECONOMIC BULLETIN ARTICLEEconomic Bulletin Issue 7, 2008
- 10 July 2008
- ECONOMIC BULLETIN ARTICLEEconomic Bulletin Issue 7, 2008
- 9 July 2008
- THE INTERNATIONAL ROLE OF THE EURORelated
- 9 July 2008
- PRESS RELEASES
- 20 June 2008
- OTHER PUBLICATIONS
- 20 June 2008
- OTHER PUBLICATIONS
- 9 August 2007
- MEP LETTER
- 25 June 2007
- THE INTERNATIONAL ROLE OF THE EURORelated
- 25 June 2007
- PRESS RELEASES
- 15 February 2007
- ECONOMIC BULLETIN ARTICLEEconomic Bulletin Issue 2, 2007
- 30 January 2007
- MEP LETTER
- 30 January 2007
- MEP LETTER
- 18 January 2007
- ECONOMIC BULLETIN ARTICLEEconomic Bulletin Issue 1, 2007
- 21 December 2005
- THE INTERNATIONAL ROLE OF THE EURORelated
- 21 December 2005
- PRESS RELEASES
- 17 November 2005
- OTHER PUBLICATIONS
- 10 November 2005
- ECONOMIC BULLETIN ARTICLEEconomic Bulletin Issue 11, 2005
- 11 August 2005
- ECONOMIC BULLETIN ARTICLEEconomic Bulletin Issue 8, 2005
- 13 June 2005
- MEP LETTER
- 25 May 2005
- OTHER PUBLICATIONS
- 14 April 2005
- MEP LETTER
- 20 January 2005
- ECONOMIC BULLETIN ARTICLEEconomic Bulletin Issue 1, 2005
- 7 January 2005
- THE INTERNATIONAL ROLE OF THE EURORelated
- 7 January 2005
- PRESS RELEASES
- 29 November 2004
- MEP LETTER
- 26 November 2004
- MEP LETTER
- 14 October 2004
- ECONOMIC BULLETIN ARTICLEEconomic Bulletin Issue 10, 2004
- 13 September 2004
- MEP LETTER
- 27 April 2004
- MEP LETTER
- 15 April 2004
- OTHER PUBLICATIONSRelated
- 15 April 2004
- OTHER PUBLICATIONSRelated
- 13 April 2004
- ECONOMIC BULLETIN ARTICLEEconomic Bulletin Issue 4, 2004
- 12 February 2004
- ECONOMIC BULLETIN ARTICLEEconomic Bulletin Issue 2, 2004
- 18 December 2003
- OTHER PUBLICATIONSEnglishOTHER LANGUAGES (19) +Related
- 18 December 2003
- PRESS RELEASESEnglishOTHER LANGUAGES (19) +
- 17 December 2003
- THE INTERNATIONAL ROLE OF THE EURORelated
- 17 December 2003
- PRESS RELEASES
- 13 November 2003
- ECONOMIC BULLETIN ARTICLEEconomic Bulletin Issue 11, 2003
- 13 November 2003
- ECONOMIC BULLETIN ARTICLEEconomic Bulletin Issue 11, 2003
- 6 October 2003
- OTHER PUBLICATIONSRelated
- 6 October 2003
- PRESS RELEASES
- 22 September 2003
- MEP LETTER
- 5 June 2003
- MEP LETTER
- 12 May 2003
- OTHER PUBLICATIONSRelated
- 8 May 2003
- MEP LETTER
- 5 May 2003
- OTHER PUBLICATIONSRelated
- 5 May 2003
- OTHER PUBLICATIONSRelated
- 13 February 2003
- ECONOMIC BULLETIN ARTICLEEconomic Bulletin Issue 2, 2003
- 19 December 2002
- THE INTERNATIONAL ROLE OF THE EURORelated
- 2 December 2002
- PRESS RELEASES
- 30 August 2002
- OTHER PUBLICATIONSAnnexesRelated
- 30 August 2002
- PRESS RELEASES
- 25 August 2002
- OTHER PUBLICATIONS
- 11 July 2002
- ECONOMIC BULLETIN ARTICLEEconomic Bulletin Issue 7, 2002
- 10 June 2002
- OTHER PUBLICATIONS
- 15 February 2002
- OTHER PUBLICATIONS
- 14 February 2002
- ECONOMIC BULLETIN ARTICLEEconomic Bulletin Issue 2, 2002
- 26 September 2001
- THE INTERNATIONAL ROLE OF THE EURO
- 30 April 2001
- OTHER PUBLICATIONS
- 11 January 2001
- ECONOMIC BULLETIN ARTICLEEconomic Bulletin Issue 1, 2001
- 12 October 2000
- ECONOMIC BULLETIN ARTICLEEconomic Bulletin Issue 10, 2000
- 30 August 1999
- OTHER PUBLICATIONSRelated
- 31 August 1999
- PRESS RELEASES
- 17 August 1999
- ECONOMIC BULLETIN ARTICLEEconomic Bulletin Issue 8, 1999