Schemes, rules, standards, processes, products and services need to be adapted in order to realise the Single Euro Payments Area (SEPA). To contribute to this process in specific areas, the Eurosystem has defined criteria and Terms of Reference for compliance with SEPA.
In 2009, the Eurosystem defined Terms of Reference for the SEPA compliance of card schemes. These Terms of Reference were based on the criteria contained in the SEPA Cards Framework developed by the European Payments Council and in The Eurosystem’s view of a SEPA for cards of November 2006.
In order to achieve the desired transparency, the Eurosystem invited card schemes to conduct self-assessments of their SEPA compliance and to publish these findings on their websites, which many of them did.In April 2014, the ECB published the report entitled Card payments in Europe – a renewed focus on SEPA for cards. This report summarises the Eurosystem’s most recent views, policies and objectives in the field of card payments. Consequently, the policy tool on SEPA compliance criteria for card schemes is to be reviewed, as it will also take into account new developments in the industry over the past few years and the relevant legislative proposals.
In addition to this, as part of its role as catalyst, the Eurosystem will continue to facilitate dialogue and to provide general guidance, aiming to achieve a SEPA for cards.
- Card payments in Europe – a renewed focus on SEPA for cards
- Press release:
- 4th Eurosystem Security Certification Forum
The Eurosystem supports the creation of the Single Euro Payments Area (SEPA), which enables retail payments in euro to be made throughout the euro area under the same basic conditions from a single account, regardless of its location. Retail payment infrastructures play an important role in achieving the objectives of SEPA.
2013 Eurosystem reference criteria for SEPA compliance of infrastructures
The Eurosystem has defined four criteria that retail payment infrastructures should fulfil in order to be considered SEPA-compliant in the view of the Eurosystem. The criteria represent the Eurosystem’s long-term vision for
- the processing of payments,
- interoperability among infrastructures,
- reachability and
- choice for SEPA scheme participants.
The requirements refer to core clearing and settlement services.
The criteria take into account SEPA-relevant developments in the infrastructure market and in the regulatory environment. The Eurosystem will continue to monitor the development of the market towards full SEPA compliance.
Criterion 1 – Processing capabilities
Infrastructures – and intra-group and intra-bank clearing and settlement arrangements – are obliged to process SEPA credit transfers (SCTs) and/or SEPA direct debits (SDDs) in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 260/2012 establishing technical and business requirements for credit transfers and direct debits in euro. To promote SEPA implementation, the Eurosystem expects infrastructures to fulfil the requirements of the relevant version of the European Payments Council’s SCT Rulebook and/or SDD Rulebook and the accompanying Implementation Guidelines.
To enhance market transparency, the Eurosystem would welcome the publication of information by infrastructures on (a) any rulebook options and (b) any additional SCT and SDD-related services (e.g. Additional Optional Services) that they offer, and whether or not these additional services are registered with the European Payments Council.
Furthermore, the Eurosystem would welcome the provision of information by infrastructures on any conversion services that they offer, including IBAN/BIC conversion services and/or routing services in an IBAN-only environment.
Adequate testing facilities are expected to be provided to existing and new participants.
Criterion 2 – Interoperability
Infrastructures are obliged to comply with Article 4.2 (on interoperability) of Regulation (EU) No 260/2012. The Eurosystem understands interoperability to refer to a set of technical and business procedures that enables the clearing and/or settlement of SEPA payments between two SEPA scheme participants that participate in two different infrastructures. In SEPA, it should be sufficient for a SEPA scheme participant to be a participant in one SEPA-compliant infrastructure without also having to be a direct or indirect participant in another one.
It is acknowledged that interoperability can be established on the basis of direct and indirect links between infrastructures, provided that this does not entail double participation obligations for payment service providers.
A direct link between retail payment systems implies that no intermediary exists between them. In practice, the EACHA (European Automated Clearing House Association) interoperability model follows this set-up.
In an indirect link between two retail payment systems, a third entity (generally a commercial bank or a central bank) intermediates between the two retail payment systems. In practice, the EBA Clearing STEP2 model follows this set-up.
To promote SEPA implementation, the Eurosystem expects infrastructures to adopt mutually or multilaterally agreed interoperability rules (e.g. interface specifications and other relevant procedures for the clearing and/or settlement of SCTs and/or SDDs between infrastructures). No participation or registration obligations should be imposed on users of other infrastructures. To enhance market transparency, the Eurosystem would welcome the provision of information by infrastructures on their active links.
Criterion 3 – Reachability
To promote SEPA implementation, infrastructures are expected to provide full reachability for SEPA scheme participants, i.e. they should be able to send/receive euro payments to/from all SEPA scheme participants in the euro area. Reachability can be achieved either through direct or indirect participants or through interoperability (see criterion 2) among infrastructures. Infrastructures are expected to establish and maintain appropriate routing databases/tables.
Criterion 4 – Choice for SEPA scheme participants
To promote SEPA implementation, infrastructures are expected to enable SEPA scheme participants to make infrastructure choices based on service and price. Consequently, infrastructures should neither apply undue access restrictions, nor impose obligations on users to process certain types of payment in a specific infrastructure or via proprietary standards. Furthermore, the transparency of the pricing/fee structure of core services is desirable.
Building on the achievements of SEPA, the Eurosystem has defined a specific set of expectations for infrastructures offering clearing services for pan-European instant payments in euro.